For agencies & studios — marketing, growth, design, branding, dev
How many of 150 prospects would book an intro call from your site?
Paste your website below. A panel of 150 realistic agency prospects — results-first marketing leads, burned-before skeptics, budget-conscious SMB owners — reads your page and reacts in plain words. You see who would book an intro call, who wouldn't, and exactly what's stopping them.
Report in ~5 minutes · $49 one-time · auto-refund if we can't produce it
“How likely are you to subscribe to this?”
def. not
unsure
def. yes
“The free tier sounds generous, but I can't tell what the paid plan actually adds. I'd try it and probably never upgrade.”
What you get
Three things, in plain language.
A straight number
How many of the 150 would book an intro call — and your percentile against other agency sites. “Better than 58% of comparable pages”, not vague advice.
Every objection, in their words
The real reasons prospects don't reach out: no results shown, unclear who you're for, generic positioning. Quoted, counted, and grouped by prospect type.
Exactly what to change
Specific rewrites tied to each objection — what to put above the fold, what proof to add, what to cut. A to-do list for your page, not theory.
Who judges your page
The jury: six kinds of agency prospect
Every agency site faces the same fixed panel, in the same proportions. That's what makes the percentile fair: your page and 180+ others, judged by the same jury.
Owns a number and buys outcomes. Wants case studies with metrics and timeframes — channels, spend, and what moved. Vibes, awards, and adjectives without evidence read as a red flag.
A previous agency burned their budget with little to show. Scrutinizes process transparency, reporting cadence, who actually does the work, and how easy it is to leave.
Comparing this agency against a freelancer or doing it in-house. Needs price signals, scope clarity, and minimum engagement terms before spending a call on it.
Arrived via a recommendation and is verifying: client roster, logos, team depth, longevity, and whether the work shown matches their industry and size.
Has a campaign or launch date and needs capacity now. Scans for speed, availability, responsiveness signals, and proof the agency ships on time.
Believes their team plus modern tools could do most of this. Needs the page to make the why-outsource case concretely — specialist skill, speed, or results they can't replicate.
Straight answers
What this is for — and what it isn't.
Built for
- Seeing which prospect types your page wins and loses — and why, in their own words
- Ranking your page against other agency sites judged by the same panel
- Finding the objections that stop inquiries: no proof of results, vague positioning, unclear pricing
- Getting concrete page changes tied to each objection
Not built for
- Predicting your exact inquiry rate — the score is directional, built for comparison
- Replacing conversations with real prospects — it gets you to those conversations with a sharper page
- Judging your agency's work itself — the panel reads your page the way a prospect does
Pricing
One page, one payment. No subscription.
Diagnostic
- 150-prospect panel on your agency page
- Intro-call intent + percentile vs comparable agency sites
- Top objections, quoted and grouped by prospect type
- Specific copy fixes for each objection
Questions
Asked by agencies & studios who should be skeptical.
Are the 150 prospects real people?
No — and we're upfront about that. They're research-grade AI personas built on a peer-reviewed method (Semantic Similarity Rating) validated against 9,300 real survey respondents, recovering about 90% of what a repeated human panel finds. A rigorous rehearsal audience, not a replacement for real prospects.
I'm a design / dev / branding studio, not a marketing agency — does the panel fit?
Yes. The panel is built around how agency buyers decide — wanting proof of results, skepticism from being burned before, budget sensitivity, deadline pressure — and those cut across agency types. You can add a note about your specific focus and the report's wording will reflect it.
Do I need to be technical to use the report?
No. The report is plain language: a number, who says no and why, and a list of changes you (or whoever edits your site) can act on.
What if you can't produce my report?
Then you aren't charged: if the page can't be read or the report can't be generated, the payment is automatically refunded.
Free guides
Before you test: the common failure patterns.
Why agencies & studios websites don't convert: the common mistakes
The objections that stop prospects from taking action on agencies & studios websites — drawn from a fixed buyer panel and 180+ scored agencies & studios pages — and how to find them on your own page.
Marketing & creative agencies (legacy combined) landing page conversion checklist
A conversion checklist for agencies & studios websites, derived from the buyer types that decide whether to book call — what each one needs to see before they act.
How to test a agencies & studios landing page before you launch
A repeatable way to test a agencies & studios landing page against a realistic buyer panel — get objections and a peer percentile in about five minutes, before you spend on traffic.
Five minutes from now
You could know exactly why prospects don't book.
Or keep rewriting the page on instinct and hoping the next version converts.
Report in ~5 minutes · $49 one-time · auto-refund if we can't produce it